<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="article">
<front>
    <journal-meta>
        <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">INFEDU</journal-id>
        <journal-title-group>
            <journal-title>Informatics in Education</journal-title>
        </journal-title-group>
        <issn pub-type="epub">1648-5831</issn>
        <issn pub-type="ppub">1648-5831</issn>
        <publisher>
            <publisher-name>VU</publisher-name>
        </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
                <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">INFE052</article-id>
                        <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15388/infedu.2005.09</article-id>
                        <article-categories>
            <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
                <subject>Article</subject>
            </subj-group>
        </article-categories>
                        <title-group>
            <article-title>Students Designing Software: a Multi-National, Multi-Institutional Study</article-title>
        </title-group>
                        <contrib-group>
                                        <contrib contrib-type="author">
                                                <name>
                    <surname>TENENBERG</surname>
                    <given-names>Josh</given-names>
                </name>
                                <email xlink:href="mailto:jtenenbg@u.washington.edu">jtenenbg@u.washington.edu</email>
                                                <xref ref-type="aff" rid="j_INFEDU_aff_000"/>
                                            </contrib>
                        <aff id="j_INFEDU_aff_000">Computing and Software Systems, Institute of Technology University of Washington, Tacoma, USA</aff>
                                                    <contrib contrib-type="author">
                                                <name>
                    <surname>FINCHER</surname>
                    <given-names>Sally</given-names>
                </name>
                                <email xlink:href="mailto:s.a.fincher@kent.ac.uk">s.a.fincher@kent.ac.uk</email>
                                                <xref ref-type="aff" rid="j_INFEDU_aff_001"/>
                                            </contrib>
                        <aff id="j_INFEDU_aff_001">Computing Laboratory, University of Kent, UK</aff>
                                </contrib-group>
                                                                                                        <volume>4</volume>
                                <issue>1</issue>
                                    <fpage>143</fpage>
                        <lpage>162</lpage>
						<pub-date pub-type="epub">
                        <day>15</day>
                                    <month>04</month>
                        <year>2005</year>
        </pub-date>
                                                        <abstract>
                        <p>This paper reports a multi-national, multi-institutional study to investigate Computer Science students&#039; understanding of software design and software design criteria. Student participants were recruited from two groups: students early in their degree studies and students completing their Bachelor degrees. Computer Science educators were also recruited as a comparison group. The study, including over 300 participants from 21 institutions in 4 countries, aimed to understand characteristics of student-generated software designs, to investigate student recognition of requirement ambiguities, and to elicit students&#039; valuation of key design criteria. The results indicate that with increases in education, students use fewer textual design notations and more graphical and standardized notations and that they become more aware of ambiguous problem specifications. Yet increased educational attainment has little effect on students&#039; valuation of key design characteristics.</p>
                    </abstract>
                <kwd-group>
            <label>Keywords</label>
                        <kwd>design</kwd>
                        <kwd>software design</kwd>
                        <kwd>empirical study of design</kwd>
                        <kwd>computer science education research</kwd>
                        <kwd>expert-novice comparison</kwd>
                    </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
</front>
</article>
