<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="foreword">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">INFEDU</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Informatics in Education</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2335-8971</issn>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">1648-5831</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>VU</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">INFEDU.2025.00</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15388/infedu.2025.00</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Foreword</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Editorial: From Policy to Pedagogy – Building Human-Centered AI Literacy Across Educational Contexts</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Hsu</surname>
            <given-names>Ting-Chia</given-names>
          </name>
          <email xlink:href="mailto:ckhsu@ntnu.edu.tw">ckhsu@ntnu.edu.tw</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="j_INFEDU_aff_000"/>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="j_INFEDU_aff_000">National Taiwan Normal University, Department of Technology Application and Human Resource Development</aff>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Lao</surname>
            <given-names>Natalie</given-names>
          </name>
          <email xlink:href="mailto:natalielao2016@gmail.com">natalielao2016@gmail.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="j_INFEDU_aff_001"/>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="j_INFEDU_aff_001">Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, USA</aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <volume>24</volume>
      <issue>4</issue>
      <fpage>645</fpage>
      <lpage>651</lpage>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>19</day>
        <month>12</month>
        <year>2025</year>
      </pub-date>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
        <copyright-holder>Vilnius University</copyright-holder>
        <license license-type="open-access">
          <license-p>Open access article under the CC BY license.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <abstract>
        <p>This editorial connects policy framework suggestions for AI literacy in elementary and secondary schools and the papers published in this special issue. The suggested framework emphasizes a human-centered vision for AI education, encompassing four domains for students – Human-Centered Mindset, AI Ethics, AI Technology and Application, and AI System Design – and five dimensions for teachers, including AI-Empowered Pedagogy and Professional Development, aligning with UNESCO AI Competency Frameworks for Students and for Teachers. Collectively, the featured papers illustrate how this policy vision can be enacted through evidence-based practice: a systematic review of AI in primary education highlights pedagogically grounded, equity-driven approaches; an empirical study on an ethical reasoning curriculum demonstrating how responsible AI thinking can be taught and assessed; a constructionist review showcases hands-on, design-based strategies that foster active learning and creativity; a qualitative study on generative AI in the applied arts reveals new professional literacies for an AI-augmented creative economy; a GenAI-integrated data-science course illustrates how usability, reliability, privacy, and ethics can be woven into disciplinary learning; a survey of preservice STEM teachers identifies affective and experiential predictors of AI self-efficacy for educators; a Structured Controversy platform shows how debate and case-based reasoning can cultivate nuanced ethical judgment in computer science students; and a problem-based mathematics course demonstrates how we can teach students to discern which types of AI tools can better support different problem-solving tasks in real-world business contexts. Together, these studies illuminate a coherent pathway from policy to practice – one that advances human-centered, ethical, and sustainable AI literacy across lifelong learning and development.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <label>Keywords</label>
        <kwd>AI literacy</kwd>
        <kwd>human-centered education</kwd>
        <kwd>ethics in AI</kwd>
        <kwd>constructionist learning</kwd>
        <kwd>generative AI</kwd>
        <kwd>policy and practice</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
</article>
